If you're new to "Think Your Way To Wealth", get free updates on debt reduction, saving money, and building wealth by subscribing to the RSS feed or via Email . Thanks for visiting!
One of the unfortunate byproducts of the current stock market meltdown, is the fact that many people are going to have to delay their retirement by a few years, if not more. When times are good, and the stock market is increasing at 8% to 12% per year, it is very difficult for people to pull money out of the stock market and put it in safer investments.
Even though I am in my mid-thirties, I have experienced two periods of time in my working life where I have had co-workers or acquaintances tell me they were going to have to defer retirement for a few years due to heavy losses sustained in their retirement accounts, both after the tech crash and subsequent effects of 9/11, and the current stock market crash.
An equally unfortunate part of the equation is that many people getting close to retirement age these days are now pulling ALL of their retirement investments out of the stock market, and may never be able to make up the difference.
So how do you avoid this scenario?
The answer is asset allocation.
Asset allocation is how you have your investments proportioned in each investment category. For example, you could invest in stocks, bonds, real estate, and commodities (gold, oil, etc.), leave your money in cash, or even invest in foreign currency. Most of the categories can be broken down further, such as large cap stocks, small cap stocks, etc. Also, you can invest in some categories, such as commodities or even real estate by either buying certain companies that are part of that industry (i.e., stocks), or exchange traded funds that invest in a particular commodity (such as gold or oil), or even a real estate investment trust (REIT) for real estate. For the sake of simplicity, and because it is frequently the only investment outside of a home, let’s just look at retirement accounts an focus on stocks vs. bonds vs. cash-keeping in mind that some stocks could be a gold ETF or a REIT for real estate. The goal of asset allocation is to reduce volatility and limit the potential downside of loses to one class of asset. By the same token, however, the upside (or potential for gains) can be reduced if one asset class sees large gains.
There are two components of asset allocation that you need to examine:
1.) Your asset allocation vs. age, or when you want to retire.
2.) How often you rebalance your portfolio, or changing your asset allocation.
Asset allocation vs. age
There is an old rule of thumb, that the amount of investments you keep in stocks (vs. bonds or cash) should be 100 minus your age. For example, if you were 40 years old, the amount of money you keep in stocks would be 100-40 = 60%. While this may have seemed conservative a year or two ago, there are many, many people who would have loved to have this type of allocation over the last year. I would surmise that this could be adjusted somewhat based on your own personal risk tolerance, as well. But even if you were 20 years old, it would still mean that you would have 20% of your retirement funds in bonds or cash, such as a money market fund. Benjamin Graham (Warren Buffett’s mentor) recommended at least 25% in each category, and suggested that a 50/50 split might be appropriate.
Rebalancing Your Portfolio- Re-allocation of Assets
At some interval, whether it is every 6 months or every year, you should rebalance your portfolio back to the asset allocation you determined was right for you. You should also take into account your age, or how soon you want to retire. The closer you get to retirement, the “less risky” your overall portfolio should be.
Why?
Because this is how you lock in stock market gains, and limit losses. Going back to Warren Buffet’s mentor, he recommends a simpler way-
A good case can be made for a consistent 50-50 (stocks vs. bonds) division here, with adjustments for changes in the market level. This means the investor would switch some of his stocks into bonds on significant rises of the market level, and vice-versa when the market declines.
I do not see this as market timing-it is not based on what the stock market or your investments are going to do, but what they have already done-there is a key difference there.
By properly allocating your retirement assets to your age or retirement, as well as your risk tolerance, and rebalancing on a regular basis, you can limit the volatility in your retirement accounts and approach retirement age without worrying about a massive drop in the stock market putting your retirement plans on hold.
Are your retirement accounts allocated across different investment types? Do you rebalance on a regular basis?
Similar Posts:
- Is Buy and Hold Investing Dead or Just Misunderstood?
- How’s My 401k in the Current Market?- I’m Not Really Sure!
- Defining and Investing for Short, Medium, and Long Term Personal Finance Goals
- Don’t Stop Contributing to Your 401k because of Recent Stock Market Performance!
If you have enjoyed this article, please consider subscribing to Think Your Way To Wealth updates
using
an RSS reader or
by email to get all of the latest posts and updates delivered for free!



















{ 1 trackback }
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
I have my retirement funds invested across 10 different asset categories (using Scott Burns’ 10 Speed Portfolio). I also have short term, low risk investments to cover needs in a down market. I rebalance once per year (in November) and do not see a need to make age adjustments at this point. Even if you are 65 years old, you may need that money to last another 25 years or more.
@ToughMoney- Sounds like you have a very good grip on your asset allocation! I still have a ways to go before retirement, but I need to start thinking about it a lot more. You are right, if you have low risk investments that can cover you , you probably don’t need to worry too much about the age issue. Thanks for the input!